Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy M31 is older and a little bit thicker than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a lot better display than Galaxy M31, because it has a much brighter display, a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bigger display. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much greater performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy M31 has a bit better battery duration than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.