Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is much better than vivo NEX 3, getting an 85 score against 73.9. IPhone 8 is an older cellphone than vivo NEX 3, but Apple was able to make it extremely lighter and a lot thinner. IPhone 8 features a little faster CPU than vivo NEX 3, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 8 features a little more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller display. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Apple iPhone 8 and vivo NEX 3 have incredibly similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo NEX 3 has a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.