Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-16 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is better than vivo NEX 3, getting an 86.6 score against 73.9. The iPhone SE (2022) body is incredibly newer, way lighter and notably thinner than the vivo NEX 3. The iPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo NEX 3 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, although it has a little lower screen pixels density, a much smaller display and a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal storage. IPhone SE (2022) counts with a little bit better performance than vivo NEX 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Vivo NEX 3 features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2018mAh. The vivo NEX 3 takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.