Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than vivo NEX 3, with a score of 81.6 against 73.9. Google Pixel 2 is an older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but it is thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo NEX 3 has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The vivo NEX 3 features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.