Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glowing night | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. The LG V20 is an notably older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but LG managed to make it somewhat thinner and much lighter. Vivo NEX 3 has just a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The LG V20 has a slightly better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo NEX 3 takes way better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
LG V20 has a better memory to install games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.