Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a 79.1 score against 73.9. LG V30's construction is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than the vivo NEX 3, although it was released many years before. LG V30 has a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V30 has a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 features better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 captures a lot better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.