Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and vivo NEX 3 were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG V50 ThinQ is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Vivo NEX 3 has a little faster processor than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 has just a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.