Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, with a 76.4 score against 73.9. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Droid Turbo's design is somewhat lighter than the vivo NEX 3, although it's somewhat thicker and was released 5 years before.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much more vibrant screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Vivo NEX 3 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo NEX 3 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo NEX 3 features a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.