Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glowing night | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a global score of 81.2 against 73.9. The Motorola Edge 50 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the vivo NEX 3. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Vivo NEX 3 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Vivo NEX 3 and Motorola Edge 50 count with very similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both have equal internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit better battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.