Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is slightly better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. These phones work with Android OS, but Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Moto G Stylus's body is a bit thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though they were released with only 7 months difference.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory. Moto G Stylus has a display that's very similar to the display in vivo NEX 3, because although the Moto G Stylus has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2300px and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much higher resolution camera.
Vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.