Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is just a bit better than vivo NEX 3, having a 79.8 score against 73.9. These phones use Android OS, but Moto Z4 has older 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Moto Z4 and the vivo NEX 3 were released only a few months apart, the Moto Z4 is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter.
Moto Z4 counts with a display that is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, because although the Moto Z4 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z4 features just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 has longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.