Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Glowing night | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 362 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than vivo NEX 3, getting an 84.7 score against 73.9. Galaxy A32's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while vivo NEX 3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo NEX 3 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a greater display density, a much better 1080 x 2256 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The vivo NEX 3 has a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a little bit longer battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.