Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is much better than the vivo NEX 3, getting an 82.3 score against 73.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A60 has 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A60's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo NEX 3, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a slightly better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The vivo NEX 3 features longer battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has a 32% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.