Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is a lot better than vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo NEX 3.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixels density. The vivo NEX 3 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than vivo NEX 3. Both of them have a same size back camera sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same resolution camera, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a greater memory to install applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's battery performance is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.