Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. The Galaxy M30s construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though they were released only a few months apart. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M30s has 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy M30s counts with a bit sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little greater pixels density. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy M30s has better battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The vivo NEX 3 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger camera aperture, a way more MP back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.