Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Samsung Galaxy M31s is a a little bit lighter cellphone than vivo NEX 3, but both have the same thickness. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy M31s features a little bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Vivo NEX 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy M31s's camera is just as good as the camera in vivo NEX 3, both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a 64 MP, the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same camera sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.