Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an noticeably older phone than vivo NEX 3, but Samsung could make it notably thinner and extremely lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo NEX 3 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.