Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the vivo NEX 3, with an 85.5 score against 73.9. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3, although it was released about 13 months before. Vivo NEX 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The vivo NEX 3 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a much higher resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.