Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Although iPhone 8 is notably older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still incredibly lighter. Apple iPhone 8 has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a lot bigger display, a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a better pixel count per inch in the display and a lot brighter display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a much better video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the iPhone 8 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.