Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 77.8. IPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS. The iPhone SE (2022) is a notably older and extremely thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple could make it extremely lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has more pixels per inch of display, a really brighter screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a way bigger screen. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 2018mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a lot higher video resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light images and a much more MP back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.