Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 84.5 score against 77.8. Although the iPhone XS Max is older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display, a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and way more brightness.
The iPhone XS Max has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 448 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
IPhone XS Max not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.