Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. LG V30 is a much older and extremely thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to make it much lighter anyway. The LG V30 has a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than LG V30, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG V30, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 73 percent bigger battery capacity.
LG V30 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.