Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 83.7 score against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. LG V50 ThinQ's design is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's much thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.