Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 77.8 against 76.4. These phones include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a way worse display pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 46 percent larger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.