Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing the user some additional features. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's much thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and 13 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a lot better video definition, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.