Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 81.2 score against 77.8. These phones include the same Android 14 OS, so they should offer the same operating system features. Motorola Edge 50's construction is incredibly thicker but lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and both were only released with a few months difference.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a way brighter screen, a better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.