Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 79.7 against 77.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Motorola Moto G Stylus is a much older and thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola made it lighter anyway.
Moto G Stylus counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little more pixels per inch of display and a larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos, a higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Moto G Stylus is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.