Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z4 has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Moto Z4's design is noticeably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's a lot thicker and was released 5 years before.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a larger screen, a just a little higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Moto Z4, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a more megapixels camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery life than Moto Z4, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Moto Z4 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.