Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 80.3 score against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A12 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact Galaxy A12 is noticeably older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher pixels density, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A12, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a lot higher video definition, a camera with more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.