Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 414 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 84.7 against 77.8. Galaxy A32's body is a bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video, a way higher video resolution and a camera with more megapixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A32, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.