Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy A60 features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better video resolution, a much larger sensor and a back camera with a much higher resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.