Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a general score of 84.2 against 77.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a way bigger display, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a little higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better video resolution, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.