Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a bigger screen, a little more pixels per display inch and a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.