Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star has a global score of 82.1, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Even though the Galaxy A8 Star is noticeably older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A8 Star has the newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, offering some nice extra features and better performance.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of display and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better resolution back camera, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.