Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is extremely older, just a little heavier and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A80, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger display and a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a back facing camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger aperture, a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.