Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 90.5 score against 77.8. Galaxy A90 5G's design is just a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is incredibly thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 OS.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with a higher resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.