Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 81 score against 77.8. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is somewhat lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a way larger display and a just a little higher pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher video resolution, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.