Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Galaxy M30s is a incredibly older and thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little better display density and a larger screen. Galaxy M30s features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M30s, because it has a higher resolution back camera, a way higher video definition, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has just a bit longer battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.