Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 86.5 score against 77.8. Although Samsung Galaxy M31 is incredibly older and extremely thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has the older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy M31, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger screen, a little more pixels per display inch and a way brighter screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M31 has an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a little longer battery lifetime than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M31, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs, a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.