Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 88 against 77.8. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M31s has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Galaxy M31s is a notably older and notably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung could make it just a little lighter anyway.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better screen than Galaxy M31s, because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a just a bit higher screen density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M31s has just a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.