Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 79.3 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a way older and noticeably thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably lighter anyway. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a little bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 90 percent bigger battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a lot larger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos, a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.