Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Grey and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 81 against 77.8. The Xperia 5 body is way lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is way thicker and was released many years before. The Sony Xperia 5 has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Xperia 5, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a much bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Xperia 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a way higher video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia 5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Xperia 5, because it has an 82% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Sony Xperia 5 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.