Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ1 has a score of 78.3, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Even though Xperia XZ1 is older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a much larger display and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 features a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1, because it has a larger camera aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures, a much higher 50 MP resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ1, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xperia XZ1 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.