Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 has a score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Xperia XZ2's construction is just a little bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. Sony Xperia XZ2 features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Xperia XZ2, because although it has a little inferior pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a much bigger display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and much more brightness. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.