Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 general score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is newer and a lot thinner than Xiaomi Mi 5s's, although it is also way heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, much more brightness and a really bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 78 percent greater battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 5s. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi 5s, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.