Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 85.5 against 77.8. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is notably older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a larger screen, a really brighter screen and a little bit greater display pixels density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.