Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than vivo X50 Pro, getting a global score of 84.9 against 75.4. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's design has the same thickness than the vivo X50 Pro, but it is just a little heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a brighter screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a little better screen pixels density.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a bit superior processor than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality pictures and videos and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography.
Vivo X50 Pro features a much better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.