Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. The iPhone 8 is an incredibly older cellphone than vivo X50 Pro, but Apple could make it a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each screen inch, a really smaller screen and a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution.
The iPhone 8 has a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The vivo X50 Pro has a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a back camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
The vivo X50 Pro and the iPhone 8 count with very similar memory for games and applications, both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.