Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Alpha grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is much better than vivo X50 Pro, having a score of 86.6 against 75.4. IPhone SE (2022)'s design is newer, lighter and a little thinner than the vivo X50 Pro. IPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X50 Pro works with Android 10 OS. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone SE (2022) counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334px and a lot smaller display. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a bigger aperture. The vivo X50 Pro features a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 2018mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.