Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is older and somewhat heavier than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is still a bit thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density and a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution. Vivo X50 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X50 Pro has better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.